Nuremberg Code
For many decades it has been illegal and unethical to mandate or coerce any medical treatment. The Nuremberg Code was agreed upon after WWII. The Nazis did medical experiments on people. World organizations were so appalled that they vowed it would never happen again! Virtually all countries, NGOs, organizations, policy leaders, and physicians adhere to this principle, including the USA, the European Union, United Nations and the World Health Organization. Quite simply, by international law, no person can ever be coerced to accept medical treatment.
Nuremberg Code #1:
- No element of force/fraud/deceit/duress/overreaching/
coercion/constraint can be used to make you accept medical treatment
- The patient must have sufficient knowledge and comprehension to make an enlightened decision
Nuremberg Code #6:
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- There cannot be unacceptable risk of infertility.
Pfizer’s ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ — and Legacy Media’s Failure to Report on Them
In an interview with The Defender, Naomi Wolf, journalist and CEO of Daily Clout and author of “The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity”, detailed the serious vaccine-related injuries that Pfizer and the FDA knew of by early 2021, but tried to hide from the public.
by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. October 21, 2024
“Pfizer knew about the inadequacies of its COVID-19 vaccine trials and the vaccine’s many serious adverse effects, and so did the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But the FDA promoted the vaccines anyway — and later tried to hide the data from the public, according to Naomi Wolf, editor of ‘The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity.’
In an interview with The Defender, Wolf detailed the serious vaccine-related injuries that Pfizer and the FDA knew of by early 2021, based on the data from Pfizer’s clinical trials and post-marketing studies.
To produce ‘The Pfizer Papers,’ Wolf, a journalist and CEO of Daily Clout, and Daily Clout Chief Operations Officer Amy Kelly convened thousands of volunteer scientists and doctors to analyze Pfizer data and supplementary data from other public reporting systems to capture the full scope of the vaccines’ effects. They
Wolf and Kelly obtained the data from the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a group of more than 30 medical professionals and scientists who sued the FDA in 2021 to force the agency to release the data, after the FDA refused to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request.
A federal court in 2022 ordered the agency to release 450,000 internal documents pertaining to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Wolf told The Defender that because her grandparents lost eight siblings in the Holocaust, she didn’t use the language “crime against humanity” lightly. However, she said, the reports make clear that given what Pfizer knew about the damage to human health caused by the mRNA COVID-19 shots, ‘There’s no way to avoid concluding that this is not carelessness, it’s not greed, it’s not sloppiness at the manufacturing plant.’
As they say in tech, ‘it’s not a bug, it’s a feature,’ she said. ‘In other words, damaging humans in very specific ways, very early on, was obviously a result of these injections. And instead of stopping, or pulling them off the market, Pfizer doubled down, the FDA doubled down and the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] doubled down.’
Wolf said Pfizer, the FDA and CDC made those decisions knowing that 1,223 people died from the shots in the first three months. They did it knowing that the vaccine didn’t stop infection, that it caused a long list of serious side effects in tens of thousands of people, she said.
Pfizer also manipulated data to get the FDA to sign off on the emergency use authorization (EUA), she said. In what Wolf called ‘one of the most damning reports in this book,’ Australian anesthesiologist Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan’s team found that Pfizer delayed recording deaths so they did not have to be included as part of its EUA data filing.
The researchers concluded that if Pfizer had recorded and reported the deaths in a timely manner, the FDA wouldn’t have been able to grant an EUA for the vaccine.
Wolf said:
‘These are tens of thousands of blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders, epilepsies, dementia, Alzheimer’s, bell’s palsy, tremors, convulsions, liver damage, kidney damage, stroke, so many kinds of skin eruptions, eye damage, blindness, respiratory illness.’
The most common side effect was myalgia or muscle pain and the second-most common side effect was joint pain, which people often don’t realize is related to the injection, she said. The third most common side effect was COVID-19 because the vaccine didn’t stop transmission.
However, ‘the centerpiece’ of ‘The Pfizer Papers’ is Pfizer’s experimentation on human reproduction, Wolf said. The papers reveal that Pfizer knew early on that the shots were causing menstrual damage at scale, she said.
The company reported to the FDA that 72% of the recorded adverse events were in women. Of those, about 16% involved reproductive disorders and functions.
The papers show that in the clinical trials, thousands of women experienced daily bleeding, hemorrhaging, and passing of tissue, and thousands of women reported that their menstrual cycle stopped completely.
Pfizer was aware that lipid nanoparticles from the shots accumulated in the ovaries and crossed the placental barrier, compromising the placenta and keeping nutrients from the baby in utero, Wolf said.
Babies had to be delivered early, she said, and women were hemorrhaging in childbirth.
That also means that the particles entered the amniotic sac, and the membranes around the testes of baby boys, according to the papers. The future effects on those baby boys are unknown.
One of the most disturbing reports in the papers, she said, is the pregnancy lactation report, ‘that will chill your soul.’ The report describes the effects on nursing babies of recently vaccinated mothers. The list includes fever, vomiting and edema, or swollen tissue, among many other issues.
‘One baby convulsed and died in the hospital of multi-organ failure,’ Wolf said. “These babies were inconsolable. They [Pfizer] knew they were poisoning breast milk, and to this day they haven’t told vaccinated moms not to breastfeed.’
The report also includes a description of two babies who died in utero, she said, which Pfizer concluded was due to maternal exposure to the vaccine.
Pfizer sent the pregnancy and lactation report detailing the vaccine’s effects on women and babies to the FDA on April 20, 2021. Two days later, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky gave a White House press conference, during which she told women there was no bad time to get a COVID-19 shot — before, during or after pregnancy.”
Article by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. Visit https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/naomi-wolf-the-pfizer-papers-book/?utm_id=20241021 for full article
Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master’s from the University of Texas at Austin.
How Politics Corrupted Evidence-Based Medicine — And How to Fix It
Some proposals for reforms include:
- Regulators must be freed from drug company funding. This includes the FDA funding — which must come directly from the government, as opposed to pharma fees, as is now the case. Tying employee salaries to pharma fees creates a huge conflict of interest within the FDA.
- The revolving door between regulators like the FDA, the CDC and big pharma (as well as tech/media) must stop. Employment contracts for regulatory government positions must have “non-compete” clauses whereby employment opportunities are limited upon leaving these regulatory agencies. Likewise, big pharma executives should not fill leadership positions at regulatory agencies.
- Taxation imposed on pharmaceutical companies to allow public funding of independent trials; and perhaps most importantly, anonymized individual patient-level trial data posted, along with study protocols. These data to be provided on suitably accessible websites so that third parties, self-nominated or commissioned by health technology agencies, could rigorously evaluate the methodology and trial results.
- Clinical trial data must be made public. Trial consent forms are easily changed to make this anonymized data freely available.
- Publication of data must be open and transparent. The government has a moral obligation to trial participants, real people who have been involved in risky treatment and have a right to expect that the results of their participation will be used in keeping with principles of scientific rigor.
- The government has a moral obligation to the public to conduct clinical trials in ways that are unbiased by industry.
- The Foundation for the CDC and the Foundation for the NIH, which runs clinical trials and studies for these organizations (while their boards are made up of pharma industry executives and employees) must be decommissioned. We have laws in this country whereby the government does not accept volunteer labor, or direct donations to influence government decisions. These NGOs are doing just that. These practices must be stopped. They are intentionally using these organizations to bypass federal laws concerning exertion of undue influence on federal decision-making.
- Off-label drugs must continue to be used by the medical community. The early treatment protocols, which have saved countless lives, have documented the important role that physicians have played in finding cheap and effective treatments for COVID as well as many other diseases. Let doctors be doctors.
- Scientific and medical journals must be stopped from taking money from big pharma. This includes the sales of reprints, banner ads, print ads, etc.
- Government must stop interfering with the publishing of peer-reviewed papers and social media. A free press must remain free from coercion from the government. We all know countless examples, such as the Trusted News Initiative and White House meetings with big tech to influence what is allowed to be printed. And the billions of dollars spent by the U.S. Government to promote these EUA/unlicensed “vaccine” products that do not prevent infection or transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is a direct assault on our first amendment rights. It also skews evidence-based medicine.
- Informed consent, one of the foundations of modern medicine, has been stymied by the FDA, NIH, the CDC hospitalists, big tech and social media. They have been hiding data and skewing results. When people can not get the information they need to make an informed decision, evidence-based medicine can not function correctly.
- The government must stop picking winners and losers. Evidence-based medicine requires a non-biased playing field.
- Industry concerns about privacy and intellectual property rights should not hold sway.
If we ever trust and support the concept of evidence-based medicine again, significant changes to the system must be enacted. The only question is… is our government up to the job?
Originally published by Robert W. Malone. M.D., M.S. on Substack.
AHA Patient’s Bill of Rights
The patient has the right to considerate and respectful care.
The patient is entitled to the opportunity to discuss and request information related to the specific procedures and/or treatments, the risks involved, the possible length of recuperation, and the medically reasonable alternatives and their accompanying risks and benefits.
The patient has the right to… refuse a recommended treatment or plan of care to the extent permitted by law and hospital policy and to be informed of the medical consequences of this action. In case of such refusal, the patient is entitled to other appropriate care and services that the hospital provides.
The patient has the right to consent to or decline to participate in proposed research studies or human experimentation affecting care and treatment or requiring direct patient involvement and to have those studies fully explained prior to consent. A patient who declines to participate in research or experimentation is entitled to the most effective care that the hospital can otherwise provide.
Source:
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/medical-rights
SUPREME COURT SAYS EMPLOYERS MUST ACCOMMODATE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS July 11, 2024
Navy Lawsuit a partial win
Protect Your School Children
The WHO has stated that sending your child to school on Vaccine Day is considered “implied consent.” Protect your rights by sending a “Does Not Consent” form to your child’s school. Have them put it in their medical file. Also, make sure to write that you do not consent to any vaccine or shot if your child gets hurt playing sports. In fact, I wrote on my child’s sports forms that I do not consent to any medical treatment without my written consent.
People Against Coerced Shots 